Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyer | Serving East Aurora, NY
Over 20 Years Experience Fighting Big Pharma! We Care Enough that We Have Medical Professionals on Staff. Call or Click Today!
Medical devices are intended to resolve health problems and improve your health. Far too often, these devices have the opposite effect. They can create problems worse than the ones they were designed to fix. The attorneys of Salter Ferguson, LLC, based in Birmingham, represent people who have been injured by defective medical devices. We also represent the survivors of …
Hip replacement devices made by Stryker Orthopaedics were voluntarily recalled over concerns that the metal-to-metal contact of replacement components caused harm to surrounding body tissue, pain, and swelling. Failure of these components releases toxins into the blood causing metal poisoning.
A growing body of evidence suggests that metal-to-metal hip replacements are inherently defective. If you have a Stryker hip replacement device and are experiencing pain, swelling and other symptoms you may be entitled to compensation from the manufacturer. Learn your rights by consulting an East Aurora attorney handling this type of case.
An attorney can often resolve your particular legal issue faster and better than trying to do it alone. A lawyer can help you navigate the legal system, while avoiding costly mistakes or procedural errors. You should seek out an attorney whose practice focuses on the area of law most relevant to your issue.
In general, how much an attorney costs will often depend on these four factors: billing method and pricing structure, type of legal work performed, law firm prestige, and attorney experience. Depending on the legal issue you are facing, an attorney may bill you by the hour, settle on a flat fee, or enter into a contingency fee agreement. The type of legal work you need help with will also play a role in cost incurred.
Personal jurisdiction - Requirement that a particular court have authority over a person, in order to bind that person to the judgment of the court, based on minimum contacts. International Shoe Co v. Washington is a landmark Supreme Court case outlining the scope of a state court's reach in personal jurisdiction.
Lead Counsel's objective process independently verifies attorney records, conferring with state bars across the country and conducting annual reviews to confirm that the attorney practices in the legal categories as indicated, possesses a valid bar license, and is eligible to practice in the specific jurisdiction.